13.2 C
London
Tuesday, August 5, 2025
Home Blog

Is Your Herbicide Real? Here’s How to Find Out


The agriculture industry is no stranger to counterfeit products, but the rise of fake herbicides poses a particularly dangerous challenge.

Across regions like Africa, Asia, and parts of South America, unsuspecting farmers are falling victim to substandard or fake herbicides that either do not work, harm crops, or damage the environment.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), up to 15% of pesticides in developing countries could be counterfeit, costing farmers billions of dollars in crop losses and long-term soil damage.

For farmers and agro-dealers alike, identifying a real herbicide from a fake one has never been more critical.

This in-depth guide will walk you through practical steps to identify authentic herbicides, understand why counterfeit products exist, and what you can do to safeguard your crops and income.

1. Why Counterfeit Herbicides Are a Growing Problem

Fake herbicides are often cheaper, poorly packaged imitations of genuine products. They may contain incorrect active ingredients, no active ingredient at all, or even dangerous chemicals not approved for use.

Key risks include:

  • Crop failure or reduced yields

  • Soil contamination

  • Resistance buildup in weeds

  • Economic losses due to reapplication and replanting

  • Health hazards for users and consumers

Counterfeiters exploit weak regulations, poor supply chain monitoring, and farmer desperation during planting seasons.

2. Signs Your Herbicide Might Be Fake

Here are red flags that your herbicide may be counterfeit:

a) Suspiciously Low Price

If a product is significantly cheaper than similar branded herbicides, especially at peak farming season, it could be fake.

b) Poor Packaging Quality

Look out for:

  • Faded labels

  • Broken seals

  • Misspelled words

  • Lack of batch number or expiry date

c) Unusual Smell, Color, or Texture

Real herbicides are manufactured under strict quality control. If the color, smell, or viscosity seems off, be cautious.

d) Ineffectiveness in the Field

If weeds persist after application or you see plant damage within days, you may be dealing with a substandard product.

Infographic - How to Spot a Fake3. How to Verify the Authenticity of Your Herbicide

a) Buy from Authorized Dealers Only

Purchase your herbicide from certified agro-vets or distributors listed by the manufacturer or your local agriculture authority. Avoid roadside vendors or unknown online platforms.

b) Use Digital Verification Tools

Many genuine herbicide companies now include QR codes or scratch panels that allow farmers to verify product authenticity through SMS or a mobile app.

Examples include:

  • Bayer’s ‘Mobile Verify’ system

  • Syngenta’s QR code security labels

  • CropLife’s anti-counterfeit awareness programs

c) Check Regulatory Approvals

In many countries, approved herbicides are listed by the Pest Control Products Board (PCPB) or an equivalent authority. Cross-reference product names and batch numbers on official websites.

d) Inspect the Label Thoroughly

Confirm:

  • Correct spelling of the product and company name

  • Registration number from your country’s pesticide authority

  • Clearly marked manufacture and expiry dates

  • Contact information for the manufacturer

e) Ask for a Receipt

Legitimate sellers will always issue a receipt, which can be useful in case of future claims or investigations.

4. What To Do If You Suspect a Fake Herbicide

a) Stop Using It Immediately

Cease application to prevent further damage to your crops and soil.

b) Report It to Authorities

Report the suspected product to:

  • The national pesticide regulatory authority (e.g., PCPB in Kenya, NAFDAC in Nigeria)

  • Local extension officers or agricultural input associations

  • The original manufacturer (through their customer service or anti-counterfeit reporting channels)

c) Keep the Packaging

Retain the container and receipt as evidence for further inspection.

5. How Governments and Brands Are Fighting Back

Leading agrochemical companies and governments are taking steps to combat this crisis:

  • Enhanced product labeling with tamper-proof technology

  • Stricter regulations and random inspections of agro-dealers

  • Awareness campaigns targeting farmers

  • Collaborations with customs and anti-counterfeit bodies

Still, the burden often falls on farmers and agro-dealers to stay vigilant and educated.

6. Tips for Safe and Responsible Herbicide Use

Whether your product is genuine or not, safe handling remains essential:

  • Always read and follow label instructions.

  • Use protective gear during application.

  • Avoid overuse or mixing incompatible products.

  • Store herbicides in their original containers, away from sunlight and children.

Protect Your Land, Protect Your Livelihood

Fake herbicides are more than just a nuisance—they’re a real threat to food security, health, and economic progress. As counterfeiters become more sophisticated, farmers must also become more informed.

The good news? You don’t need high-tech tools—just keen observation, trusted sources, and a few verification steps can go a long way in protecting your investment.

When in doubt, don’t spray it out. Check it first.

Also Read

Fake Farm Inputs: Counterfeit Crisis Threatens Kenya’s Agriculture

Fertilizer Costs Surpass Corn Revenue, StoneX Warns of Margin Squeeze

The Hidden Costs of Equipment Financing: What Your Dealer Won’t Tell You


When you’re standing in the dealership lot, admiring that gleaming new tractor or combine harvester, the salesperson’s pitch sounds almost too good to be true: “Low monthly payments, quick approval, and you can take it home today!”

But beneath the surface of these attractive financing offers lies a complex web of hidden costs that can significantly impact your farm’s bottom line.

Understanding these concealed expenses isn’t just about saving money—it’s about protecting your operation’s financial health and making informed decisions that align with your long-term farming goals.

Let’s pull back the curtain on the equipment financing industry and reveal what dealers prefer to keep in the fine print.

The Psychology of the Sales Floor

Equipment dealers are skilled at focusing your attention on the monthly payment figure while glossing over the total cost of ownership.

This psychological tactic works because farmers, like most buyers, naturally gravitate toward immediate cash flow concerns rather than long-term financial implications. The result?

Many operators walk away with financing agreements that cost thousands more than anticipated.

Consider this scenario: A dealer quotes you $1,200 monthly payments for a $150,000 tractor over seven years.

Sounds reasonable, right? But that monthly figure might not include several mandatory add-ons that could push your actual payment to $1,500 or more. Over seven years, that $300 difference translates to $25,200 in unexpected costs.

Insurance: The Mandatory Money Drain

One of the most significant hidden costs in equipment financing is comprehensive insurance coverage. While dealers typically mention insurance is “required,” they rarely elaborate on the specific coverage levels or associated costs.

Full Coverage Requirements Lenders typically mandate comprehensive and collision coverage with low deductibles, often $500 or less.

For a $200,000 combine, this coverage can cost $3,000-$5,000 annually, depending on your location and claims history. Over a typical five-year loan term, insurance alone adds $15,000-$25,000 to your total equipment cost.

Gap Insurance Pressure Dealers often push gap insurance, which covers the difference between your loan balance and the equipment’s actual cash value if it’s totaled.

While this protection has merit, dealers typically mark up gap insurance premiums by 50-100% compared to what you’d pay through your regular insurance agent. A $2,000 gap insurance policy might actually be available for $800-$1,000 elsewhere.

Stored Equipment Coverage Many financing agreements require full coverage even when equipment sits unused during off-seasons.

This means you’re paying comprehensive insurance premiums year-round on a planter that only runs for three weeks in spring.

Some operators have successfully negotiated seasonal coverage adjustments, but dealers rarely volunteer this option.

The Balloon Payment Trap

Balloon payments represent one of the most dangerous hidden costs in equipment financing. These large, final payments can range from 15-40% of the original loan amount and often catch farmers off guard.

The Refinancing Gamble Dealers frequently present balloon payments as “no problem” because you can “just refinance when the time comes.”

However, this assumes several factors will align in your favor: stable or improved credit, favorable interest rates, and sufficient equity in the equipment. If any of these conditions aren’t met, you could face financial disaster.

Real-World Example A corn and soybean farmer in Illinois financed a $280,000 combine with a five-year loan featuring a $75,000 balloon payment.

When the balloon came due, the combine’s value had depreciated to $85,000, but his credit score had dropped due to two difficult growing seasons.

The bank demanded a $50,000 down payment for refinancing, money the farmer didn’t have. He was forced to sell the combine at a loss and lease older equipment at higher monthly costs.

Seasonal Cash Flow Misalignment Balloon payments typically come due on the loan’s anniversary date, which rarely aligns with harvest income.

This timing mismatch can force farmers to seek expensive bridge financing or make difficult equipment decisions during their cash-poor periods.

Early Termination Fees: The Exit Tax

Life happens, and sometimes farmers need to exit equipment financing agreements early. Unfortunately, most contracts include punitive early termination fees that can cost thousands of dollars.

Prepayment Penalties Some lenders charge prepayment penalties ranging from 1-5% of the remaining loan balance.

On a $100,000 remaining balance, this could mean $1,000-$5,000 in fees just for paying off your loan early. These penalties are often buried in the contract’s fine print and rarely discussed during the sales process.

Lease Termination Costs Equipment leases typically include even more severe early termination penalties. Beyond the remaining lease payments, you might face:

  • Disposition fees ($500-$2,000)
  • Excess wear and tear charges
  • Mileage or usage overages
  • Remarketing costs

Trade-In Complications If you want to trade your financed equipment for a newer model, negative equity can create significant costs. Dealers may roll this negative equity into your new loan, increasing your monthly payments and extending your debt burden.

Maintenance and Warranty Manipulation

Extended warranties and maintenance contracts represent another area where dealers inflate costs while presenting them as “essential protection.”

Inflated Service Contracts Dealers often require extended warranties or service contracts as loan conditions.

While these agreements provide peace of mind, dealer markups can be substantial. A $15,000 extended warranty might cost $8,000-$10,000 if purchased independently from the manufacturer.

Maintenance Clause Restrictions Some financing agreements include maintenance clauses requiring service at authorized dealerships using OEM parts.

This restriction eliminates your ability to shop for competitive service rates or use aftermarket parts, potentially increasing your maintenance costs by 20-40% over the equipment’s life.

Warranty Voiding Tactics Dealers sometimes claim that using independent mechanics or non-OEM parts will void your warranty, even when this isn’t legally true. This misinformation keeps farmers tied to expensive dealership service departments.

Interest Rate Games

While the advertised interest rate gets attention, the actual cost of money in equipment financing involves several hidden elements.

Promotional Rate Limitations Those attractive 0.9% or 1.9% promotional rates often come with strict limitations:

  • Short loan terms (12-24 months)
  • High down payment requirements (20-30%)
  • Excellent credit score requirements (740+)
  • Specific model restrictions

Most farmers don’t qualify for these rates, but dealers use them to attract customers before steering them toward higher-rate alternatives.

Rate Markup Profits Dealers typically receive compensation from lenders for interest rate markups. If you qualify for a 4.5% rate, the dealer might quote 5.5% and pocket the difference. This practice, called “dealer reserve,” can add thousands to your total interest costs.

Variable Rate Risks Some equipment loans feature variable interest rates that can increase over time. A loan starting at 3.5% might climb to 6.5% or higher if market rates rise. Dealers often downplay this risk, focusing instead on the attractive initial rate.

The Fine Print Minefield

Equipment financing contracts contain numerous provisions that can create unexpected costs and restrictions.

Usage Limitations Many contracts include usage restrictions that aren’t clearly explained. Exceeding specified annual hours or acres can trigger penalty fees or accelerated payment demands. A combine lease might limit usage to 300 hours annually, but dealers rarely emphasize this restriction during sales discussions.

Modification Restrictions Financing agreements often prohibit equipment modifications without lender approval. This can prevent farmers from installing aftermarket precision agriculture systems or making operational improvements that could enhance productivity.

Location and Use Restrictions Some contracts restrict where equipment can be used or stored. Moving financed equipment across state lines or using it in custom farming operations might violate your agreement and trigger penalties.

Due Diligence: Your Financial Protection Strategy

Protecting yourself from hidden costs requires thorough preparation and careful contract review.

Pre-Shopping Preparation Before visiting any dealership:

  • Obtain independent financing quotes from banks and credit unions
  • Research insurance costs through your agent
  • Determine your realistic budget including hidden costs
  • Identify your must-have features versus nice-to-haves

Contract Review Essentials Never sign any financing agreement without carefully reviewing:

  • Total cost of ownership calculations
  • All fees and penalties
  • Insurance requirements and costs
  • Maintenance obligations
  • Early termination provisions
  • Usage restrictions

Professional Consultation Consider involving professionals in major equipment purchases:

  • Have your accountant review tax implications
  • Ask your attorney to explain complex contract terms
  • Consult with your insurance agent about coverage requirements
  • Get independent appraisals for trade-in values

Negotiation Strategies That Work

Armed with knowledge about hidden costs, you can negotiate better deals.

Separate Financing from Equipment Don’t let dealers bundle financing with equipment purchases. Get independent financing quotes first, then use these as leverage in negotiations. Often, you can secure better terms through banks or credit unions.

Question Every Fee Challenge every additional charge. Ask for detailed explanations of documentation fees, processing charges, and other add-ons. Many of these fees are negotiable or can be eliminated entirely.

Alternative Insurance Arrangements Negotiate the right to provide insurance through your existing agent rather than accepting dealer-arranged coverage. This often results in significant savings while maintaining required protection levels.

The Technology Factor

Modern equipment financing increasingly involves technology-related costs that dealers may not fully disclose.

Software Subscriptions Many new machines require ongoing software subscriptions for full functionality. These annual fees can range from $1,000-$5,000 per machine and typically aren’t included in financing calculations.

Data Plans and Connectivity Precision agriculture features often require cellular data plans or satellite connectivity. These monthly charges can add $50-$200 per month to your operating costs.

Technology Obsolescence Risk Rapid technological advancement means today’s cutting-edge features may become outdated before your loan matures. This obsolescence risk isn’t reflected in financing terms but can significantly impact resale values.

Building Long-Term Equipment Strategies

Understanding hidden costs should inform your broader equipment acquisition strategy.

Lifecycle Cost Analysis Evaluate equipment purchases based on total lifecycle costs rather than just acquisition price. Include financing costs, insurance, maintenance, fuel, and eventual disposal or trade-in values.

Timing Considerations Plan equipment purchases around your farm’s cash flow cycles. Avoid financing during low-income periods when additional costs are most burdensome.

Diversification Benefits Consider diversifying your equipment financing sources. Using multiple lenders can provide negotiating leverage and reduce your dependence on any single financial institution.

The Bottom Line

Equipment financing hidden costs can add 20-40% to your total equipment investment. A $150,000 tractor might actually cost $180,000-$210,000 when all hidden expenses are included.

For farmers operating on tight margins, these additional costs can mean the difference between profit and loss.

The key to protecting your operation lies in thorough preparation, careful contract review, and aggressive negotiation.

Don’t be afraid to walk away from deals that include excessive hidden costs. Remember, the best financing deal is often the one that provides transparency rather than the lowest advertised rate.

Your farm’s financial health depends on making informed equipment decisions. By understanding and preparing for hidden costs, you can make choices that support your operation’s long-term success rather than creating unexpected financial burdens.

Equipment dealers will continue using these practices because they work. But armed with knowledge about hidden costs, you can level the playing field and secure financing that truly serves your farm’s interests.

The next time you’re in a dealership, remember that the most expensive equipment purchase is often the one you don’t fully understand.

Also Read

7 Best-Selling Tractor Brands in Africa: A Comprehensive Overview

Combine Harvester Prices in Kenya (2025): A General Buyer’s Guide

Must-Have Tools for Smallholder Farmers: Spotlight on the Allen Key


In the world of small-scale farming, where resourcefulness is key and every tool counts, having a reliable set of basic hand tools can mean the difference between a productive season and costly delays.

While tractors and planters often steal the spotlight, there’s one often-overlooked tool that plays a vital role in the daily operations of smallholder farms — the Allen key.

Also known as a hex key or hex wrench, the Allen key is a small, L-shaped tool used to drive bolts and screws with a hexagonal socket.

Simple in design yet powerful in application, this compact tool has become indispensable for smallholder farmers managing their own machinery, irrigation setups, or even assembling imported equipment.

What Makes the Allen Key So Essential?

  1. Maintenance of Agricultural Equipment
    From two-wheel tractors and maize shellers to small threshers and pumps, many modern machines used on African farms come with hex socket bolts. Whether it’s tightening loose parts or replacing worn-out components, an Allen key set ensures that smallholder farmers can perform routine maintenance without the need for a technician.

  2. Assembly of Imported Machinery
    A growing number of smallholder farmers are purchasing affordable imported machinery, often shipped in semi-knocked-down (SKD) form to reduce costs. These machines, including sprayers, irrigation kits, or solar-powered equipment, often require final assembly on-site — and Allen keys are usually the primary tool included in the packaging.

  3. Repairs in Remote Locations
    Unlike large-scale farms with access to professional workshops, many smallholder farmers in rural areas need to carry out on-the-spot repairs using portable toolkits. A compact Allen key set easily fits in a tool bag or even a pocket, making it ideal for field repairs.

  4. Affordability and Accessibility
    Allen keys are among the most affordable tools in the market. A decent set with multiple sizes is easily available in local hardware stores or online platforms like Jumia Kenya or Copia. This low-cost investment brings high value, especially when dealing with precision equipment where using the wrong tool can lead to damage.


Common Uses on the Farm

  • Adjusting bolts on irrigation pump housings

  • Servicing the motor housing of a two-wheel tractor

  • Assembling greenhouse structures or netting frames

  • Repairing hand-held tools and implements with socket screws

  • Installing solar panel frames for water pumps or lighting


Why It Matters for African Smallholders

In Africa, where smallholder farmers produce up to 70% of the continent’s food, improving equipment reliability and minimizing downtime is critical.

While many development programs focus on supplying advanced machinery, equipping farmers with the right basic tools like Allen keys ensures that these machines are actually usable and maintainable in the long term.

The Allen key may not be glamorous, but it represents self-reliance, practical efficiency, and cost-saving potential — values that define successful smallholder farming.


What to Look for When Buying

  • Multiple sizes: A set with both metric and imperial sizes covers more equipment types

  • Durable material: Choose chrome vanadium steel for durability

  • Storage case: Keeps the keys organized and easy to transport

  • T-handle or L-shape options: T-handles offer better grip for stubborn bolts


Final Thoughts

The future of agriculture in Africa depends not just on big machines and digital tech, but also on empowering farmers with the right tools to take charge of their operations.

The humble Allen key may seem insignificant, but its impact on farm productivity, maintenance, and cost-efficiency makes it a must-have in every smallholder’s toolkit.

At agrimachinery.africa, we spotlight the innovations and essentials — big or small — that are shaping the future of farming on the continent.

Want to know which other tools should be in your kit? Stay tuned for our upcoming series on affordable tools every farmer should own.

Also Read

Top Smart Irrigation Systems for African Farms

How AI and Machine learning are shaping the future of farm equipment

7 Best-Selling Tractor Brands in Africa: A Comprehensive Overview


Tractors play a crucial role in Africa’s agricultural transformation, serving as key enablers of mechanized farming, increased productivity, and food security.

As smallholder farmers and commercial agribusinesses alike seek reliable machinery to support crop cultivation, land preparation, and transport, several tractor brands have emerged as market leaders across the continent.

This article explores the best-selling tractor brands in Africa, examining their market presence, strengths, and the reasons behind their widespread adoption.


1. Massey Ferguson

Headquarters: United States (AGCO Corporation)
Manufacturing/Assembly in Africa: Nigeria, South Africa, Algeria, Zimbabwe

Massey Ferguson is arguably the most recognized and widely used tractor brand in Africa. Known for its durability, simplicity, and adaptability to local farming conditions, Massey Ferguson tractors are particularly popular in countries such as Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, and South Africa.

The brand’s success is largely attributed to its broad dealer network, availability of spare parts, and strong after-sales service.

AGCO’s investment in local assembly plants, like the one in Algeria and another in Nigeria, has further strengthened its market footprint and made the brand more accessible through reduced import costs.

2. John Deere

Headquarters: United States
Manufacturing/Assembly in Africa: South Africa, Nigeria

John Deere tractors are synonymous with advanced technology and high performance. While traditionally associated with large-scale commercial farming, John Deere has increasingly introduced models suited for small to medium-sized farms in Africa.

Its tractors are popular in South Africa, Ghana, Zambia, and Tanzania, where commercial farming is more established. With robust service programs and training initiatives for operators, John Deere maintains a strong reputation for reliability and innovation.

3. New Holland

Headquarters: Italy (CNH Industrial)
Manufacturing/Assembly in Africa: South Africa, Egypt, Algeria

New Holland has carved a significant niche in the African tractor market through its wide range of affordable and efficient tractors. It is particularly favored in North African nations like Egypt and Algeria, as well as in parts of East and Southern Africa.

The brand’s focus on fuel efficiency, ease of use, and adaptability to various farm operations has made it a go-to choice for both individual farmers and government-led agricultural schemes.

4. Sonalika International (ITL)

Headquarters: India
Manufacturing/Assembly in Africa: Nigeria, Cameroon, Algeria, South Africa

Sonalika tractors have gained rapid traction across Africa due to their cost-effectiveness and suitability for rugged terrains. The brand has a strong presence in West and Central Africa, including Nigeria, Cameroon, and Ghana.

The company’s strategy to partner with local dealerships and governments to offer tractors under agricultural mechanization programs has expanded its market penetration. Sonalika’s simple mechanical systems are especially appreciated in remote areas where technical support may be limited.

5. Mahindra Tractors

Headquarters: India
Manufacturing/Assembly in Africa: Kenya, South Africa, Algeria

Mahindra has steadily grown its market share in Africa, primarily by offering affordable, robust, and low-maintenance tractors. The brand is well-known in Kenya, Zambia, Mozambique, and South Africa.

With assembly plants in key countries and strategic partnerships with African distributors, Mahindra’s tractors are increasingly preferred by smallholder farmers for their fuel efficiency and mechanical reliability.

6. Kubota

Headquarters: Japan
Manufacturing/Assembly in Africa: Limited local assembly; distribution through dealers

Kubota, though more prominent in Asian markets, is making inroads into Africa through partnerships and government procurement programs.

Its compact and medium-sized tractors are suitable for horticulture and rice farming, particularly in countries like Madagascar, Senegal, and Uganda.

Kubota’s strength lies in its engineering precision and long engine life, making it ideal for light to moderate field tasks.

7. Farmtrac (Escorts Limited)

Headquarters: India
Manufacturing/Assembly in Africa: Dealer networks in Nigeria, Kenya, and Ethiopia

Farmtrac has entered the African market with a focus on affordability and basic utility. Its tractors appeal to farmers looking for entry-level mechanization tools that are easy to maintain and operate.

While its market share is smaller compared to legacy brands, Farmtrac’s presence is growing through targeted promotions and government partnerships.

Factors Driving Tractor Brand Preference in Africa

  • Affordability: Price sensitivity is a major factor, especially among smallholder farmers. Brands offering low-cost tractors and financing solutions gain a competitive edge.

  • Durability and Serviceability: Tractors must withstand harsh terrains and climate conditions. Brands with a track record of rugged machinery and accessible spare parts perform better.

  • Dealer and Support Networks: Wide dealership coverage and local technical support play a pivotal role in brand loyalty and repeat purchases.

  • Government Procurement Programs: Brands involved in government mechanization schemes often gain significant visibility and trust among farmers.

The tractor market in Africa is dynamic, with both legacy global brands and emerging players competing to meet the continent’s agricultural needs.

Massey Ferguson, John Deere, and New Holland remain dominant due to their longstanding presence and reliability, while Indian brands like Sonalika and Mahindra are rapidly expanding through affordability and regional assembly.

As Africa continues to prioritize agricultural transformation, the demand for tractors is expected to rise, paving the way for more competition, innovation, and farmer-centric solutions across the continent.

Also Read

Top 7 Tractor Dealers in Nigeria

Top Agriculture Stocks to Watch in 2025: Global Picks for a Growing Sector

Fertilizer Costs Surpass Corn Revenue, StoneX Warns of Margin Squeeze

0

A new analysis by StoneX Financial Inc. has revealed a sharp deterioration in the economic balance between input costs and grain market returns, with the fertilizer-to-corn price ratio reaching a historic low in mid-2025.

According to the firm’s senior fertilizer strategist, this imbalance is straining profitability for American corn producers and raising broader concerns across the global agriculture sector.

The fertilizer-to-corn ratio measures how many bushels of corn a farmer must sell to cover the cost of fertilizer—one of the largest annual input expenses.

That number is now at its worst in decades, driven by persistently high fertilizer prices and stagnant corn market performance. The report highlights this as a “worst-case scenario” for growers planning their 2026 crop season.

Nitrogen-based products like urea and UAN, along with phosphate fertilizers, have remained stubbornly expensive, largely due to global energy volatility and constrained supply.

Fertilizer production is highly energy-intensive, and recent geopolitical instability—particularly production disruptions in the Middle East and export limitations in North Africa—has pushed input prices higher.

Fertilizer Costs Surpass Corn Revenue,

While prices for some commodities have begun to normalize following the supply chain shocks of 2022–2023, fertilizer has proven more resilient to downward correction.

StoneX notes that current pricing levels for phosphate fertilizers, when benchmarked against December corn futures, have reached a level not seen in over 15 years.

Corn Prices Fail to Keep Pace

At the same time, corn prices have remained under pressure. A combination of large carryover stocks, subdued global demand, and uncertain export flows has weighed on futures contracts.

With domestic inventories well above average and a competitive global grain landscape—including strong harvests in Brazil and Ukraine—U.S. corn remains priced at a disadvantage.

This stagnant pricing, against the backdrop of rising input costs, has pushed the cost-to-return margin toward unsustainable levels for many producers.

Farmers are already responding. In several Corn Belt states, there has been a noticeable shift in planting intentions, with more acreage projected for soybeans and wheat in 2026—both of which require fewer fertilizer inputs.

However, agronomists and economists warn that cutting back on fertilizer usage without proper nutrient planning could reduce yields enough to erase any savings.

StoneX cautions that while reducing fertilizer application may appear attractive in the short term, it introduces significant risk. Yield loss, if poorly managed, could worsen profitability rather than improve it.

The implications of this price imbalance extend beyond the United States. Many emerging economies rely heavily on imported fertilizers and staple crop imports such as corn.

When the cost of growing food rises in major producing countries, those effects are often passed down through global trade routes—resulting in higher prices for food-importing nations.

In countries with limited input subsidies or constrained foreign exchange reserves, reduced fertilizer application may translate into lower agricultural output and heightened food inflation. This creates a ripple effect that threatens both regional food security and political stability.

Market Outlook: Relief May Be Slow

Analysts at StoneX believe that unless there is a significant correction in fertilizer markets or a rally in corn futures, the current imbalance is likely to persist into 2026.

Some easing of input costs could come if global natural gas prices fall or if new supply from major producers—including the U.S., Russia, and North Africa—enters the market.

In the long term, increased investment in precision agriculture, soil nutrient monitoring, and alternative fertilization methods may help buffer against such volatility. However, the immediate priority for farmers is managing risk and ensuring operational viability under constrained margins.

The widening gap between fertilizer costs and corn revenue underscores a growing structural challenge in agricultural economics.

While supply and demand fundamentals will eventually rebalance, the current scenario requires a measured, strategic response from producers, agribusinesses, and policymakers alike.

StoneX’s warning serves as a timely reminder that farm profitability is deeply tied to global commodity cycles, and that managing this balance effectively is critical to ensuring both food security and economic sustainability across the agricultural value chain.

Also Read

Top Agriculture Stocks to Watch in 2025: Global Picks for a Growing Sector

Fake Farm Inputs: Counterfeit Crisis Threatens Kenya’s Agriculture

UAE Concludes High-Level Agricultural Investment Mission in Uganda

0

A high-powered delegation of investors from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has concluded a strategic investment mission in Uganda focused on unlocking opportunities in the country’s agriculture and agro-industrial sectors.

The week-long visit, which took place from June 26 to July 3, 2025, brought together executives from ten UAE-based private companies and demonstrated growing interest in Uganda’s agri-value chain potential.

The mission was coordinated by the Uganda Embassy in Abu Dhabi and the Uganda Consulate in Dubai and was fully aligned with Uganda’s Fourth National Development Plan (NDP IV), which emphasizes agriculture-led industrialization and export development.

During the visit, the UAE delegation toured several major agro-industrial enterprises across Uganda.

Their itinerary included Maganjo Grain Millers, the Namanve Tree Seed Centre, the National Union of Coffee Agribusinesses and Farm Enterprises (NUCAFE), Masubi Farm’s avocado oil facility, and Kakira Sugar Limited.

These visits provided the investors with first-hand exposure to Uganda’s agricultural production systems, processing facilities, and export readiness, especially in commodities such as coffee, grains, sugar, and edible oils.

In discussions held with Ugandan government agencies and private stakeholders, the UAE delegation expressed strong interest in investing in large-scale agricultural infrastructure.

Agro-industrial parks

Key focus areas included the development of agro-industrial parks, investment in modern irrigation systems, improvements in agricultural logistics, and collaboration with farmer cooperatives and local agro-processors to scale production and export capacity.

The Uganda Investment Authority and the Uganda Free Zones Authority actively participated in these meetings, working with the delegation to identify priority projects and establish frameworks for future investment.

Both parties agreed on the need for clear investment pathways and mutual benefits, with an emphasis on sustainable practices and local value creation.

Uganda’s government has reaffirmed its commitment to creating a supportive and transparent environment for foreign direct investment in agriculture.

Officials from the Ugandan side emphasized that partnerships like this align closely with national efforts to transition from subsistence farming to commercial agriculture, supported by international capital, innovation, and technology.

Net food importer

The UAE, which imports more than 80 percent of its food, continues to seek long-term agricultural partnerships abroad as part of its food security strategy.

Uganda, with its favorable climate, fertile land, and strategic location in East Africa, has emerged as a promising partner in this context.

Although no formal investment agreements were announced during the mission, both sides indicated their intention to continue with follow-up engagements.

These are expected to include technical feasibility studies and project-specific proposals in the months ahead.

This concluded mission marks a key step in strengthening economic relations between Uganda and the UAE.

If successfully translated into concrete projects, these discussions could lead to a wave of transformative investment in Uganda’s agriculture sector. Such investment could play a significant role in boosting export revenues, creating employment, and enhancing regional food systems.

As Uganda continues to position itself as a regional hub for agro-industrial growth, collaborations of this nature will be instrumental in realizing long-term development goals.

The success of this initiative will depend on ensuring that future investments are inclusive, well-regulated, and aligned with both national priorities and community interests.

Also Read

Fake Farm Inputs: Counterfeit Crisis Threatens Kenya’s Agriculture

Kenya Withdraws 77 Pesticides from Market in Major Agricultural Reform

Top Agriculture Stocks to Watch in 2025: Global Picks for a Growing Sector


As global concerns around food security, supply chain resilience, and climate change intensify, agriculture is becoming an increasingly strategic investment sector.

In 2025, investors are taking a closer look at agriculture-related companies not only for their stability but also for their role in shaping the future of food production.

This article highlights several leading agriculture stocks that offer both growth potential and industry leadership across a variety of subsectors.

Deere & Company (NYSE: DE)

Headquarters: United States
Industry Focus: Agricultural machinery and precision farming

Deere & Company continues to lead the agricultural equipment industry through innovation in automation, data-driven farming, and sustainability.

Its investment in autonomous tractors and precision agriculture software has positioned the company as a front-runner in smart farming technology. In 2025, Deere is expected to expand its market reach in both developed and emerging economies, driven by rising demand for productivity and efficiency in agriculture.

Nutrien Ltd. (NYSE: NTR)

Headquarters: Canada
Industry Focus: Fertilizers and crop nutrients

Nutrien is one of the world’s largest producers and distributors of potash, nitrogen, and phosphate fertilizers. With volatility in global fertilizer supply chains, Nutrien’s scale and integrated operations provide it with pricing power and market stability.

The company is also investing in digital agronomy tools and sustainability initiatives, appealing to both commercial farmers and environmentally conscious investors.

Bunge Limited (NYSE: BG)

Headquarters: United States
Industry Focus: Agribusiness and grain trading

Following the completion of its merger with Viterra, Bunge has strengthened its position as a major global player in grain and oilseed trading.

The consolidation offers expanded logistics, storage capacity, and access to key agricultural markets. The company is well-positioned to benefit from increased global demand for food commodities and the operational synergies resulting from the merger.

Corteva Agriscience (NYSE: CTVA)

Headquarters: United States
Industry Focus: Seeds and crop protection

Corteva is a leading provider of advanced seed technologies and crop protection solutions. With a growing portfolio of drought-resistant seeds and biological alternatives to synthetic pesticides, the company addresses the dual challenge of climate resilience and sustainable agriculture.

Corteva’s expansion into digital decision-support tools further enhances its value proposition to farmers in both advanced and developing markets.

The Mosaic Company (NYSE: MOS)

Headquarters: United States
Industry Focus: Fertilizer production

Mosaic recently reached a 52-week high, driven by strong demand in the global phosphate and potash markets.

As one of the few vertically integrated fertilizer producers, Mosaic benefits from both operational efficiency and supply chain control. With commodity prices fluctuating, Mosaic remains a key supplier to global agricultural economies reliant on fertilizer imports.

Key Trends Influencing Agriculture Stocks in 2025

Several macroeconomic and sector-specific factors are influencing investor interest in agriculture stocks this year:

  • Global food security concerns are prompting governments to invest in reliable supply chains and local production.

  • Technological innovation is reshaping agriculture, with advancements in automation, drones, AI, and precision farming.

  • Sustainable investment mandates are driving capital toward companies focused on resource efficiency and environmental impact.

  • Emerging market growth, particularly in regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, is expanding demand for modern agricultural inputs and services.

Conclusion

Agriculture continues to evolve into a high-tech, globally integrated industry. The companies profiled here represent a cross-section of this transformation, from machinery and seeds to fertilizers and trading platforms.

Investors looking to diversify their portfolios with exposure to essential services and long-term global demand may find compelling opportunities in the agriculture sector throughout 2025.

As always, investment decisions should be made based on thorough analysis, risk assessment, and alignment with long-term objectives.

Also Read

Fake Farm Inputs: Counterfeit Crisis Threatens Kenya’s Agriculture

Kenya Withdraws 77 Pesticides from Market in Major Agricultural Reform

Combine Harvester Prices in Kenya (2025): A General Buyer’s Guide

Combine harvesters are a vital part of modern agriculture in Kenya, offering a one-stop solution for reaping, threshing, and cleaning grain crops.

For maize, wheat, rice, and barley farmers, mechanization through combine harvesters can significantly reduce labor costs, minimize post-harvest losses, and increase efficiency—especially during peak harvesting seasons.


2025 Combine Harvester Price Ranges in Kenya

Combine harvester prices in Kenya vary widely depending on factors such as brand, condition (new or used), horsepower, grain tank capacity, and availability of after-sales service.

Combine Harvester Prices in Kenya (2025)

The table below gives a general price guide for different types of combine harvesters available in Kenya.

Category Estimated Price Range (KES) Best For
Used Mini Combine Harvesters 1,500,000 – 3,500,000 Smallholder farms and test fields
Mid-Range Used Harvesters 4,000,000 – 6,000,000 Medium-scale farms with moderate acreage
New Mid-Range Combine Harvesters 6,000,000 – 10,000,000 Reliable for consistent seasonal operations
High-End New Combine Harvesters 10,000,000 – 15,000,000+ Large-scale commercial farming operations

Note: Prices fluctuate due to exchange rates, import duties, and availability.


Popular Combine Harvester Brands in Kenya

Several reputable brands are available through local dealers or importers:

  • John Deere – Known for durability and wide dealer network.

  • Claas – Popular in large-scale wheat production.

  • New Holland – Offers good mid-range options with reliable performance.

  • Kubota – Compact models suited for rice and small-scale maize.

  • Yanmar – Ideal for small-scale and wetland harvesting.


Where to Buy Combine Harvesters in Kenya

You can explore a variety of buying options:

  • Authorized Dealers – Offer new machines, warranties, and servicing (e.g., CMC Motors, Farm Engineering Industries).

  • Agricultural Machinery Importers – Provide refurbished models from Europe or Asia.

  • Online Platforms – Websites like Jiji, Cheki, and Expat-Dakar often list used harvesters.

  • Agricultural Shows – Events like the Nairobi International Trade Fair showcase demos and deals.


Key Factors to Consider Before Buying

Before making a purchase, evaluate the following:

  1. Farm Size & Crop Type – Choose the right capacity for your acreage and target crop.

  2. Parts Availability – Ensure that spare parts are readily available locally.

  3. After-Sales Service – Consider dealers who offer maintenance and technical support.

  4. Fuel Efficiency – Operating costs impact long-term profitability.

  5. Resale Value – Stick to reputable brands that retain value over time.


Financing & Leasing Options

Don’t let the price tag deter you—several financing options are available:

  • Agri-loans from commercial banks (e.g., Equity Bank, KCB, Cooperative Bank).

  • Government programs via the Agricultural Finance Corporation (AFC).

  • Leasing arrangements from cooperatives or input suppliers.

  • NGO and donor support, particularly for youth and women in agribusiness.


Invest in Mechanization for Long-Term Returns

As Kenya’s agriculture continues to shift toward mechanization, investing in a combine harvester is a game-changer for grain farmers. Whether you opt for a refurbished machine or a brand-new model, make your decision based on long-term efficiency, service access, and suitability for your farm.

Also Read

Top 7 Tractor Dealers in Nigeria

Top 10 Tractor Attachments Every Smallholder Should Know

Top 7 Tractor Dealers in Nigeria


Agriculture remains the backbone of Nigeria’s economy, employing over 70% of the population either directly or indirectly.

In a country with vast arable land and diverse agro-ecological zones, mechanization is not just an option—it’s a necessity.

Tractors are at the heart of this mechanization drive, enabling farmers to increase productivity, reduce labor costs, and improve efficiency.

This article highlights the top tractor dealers in Nigeria who are leading the charge in equipping farmers with the right tools for modern agriculture.

1. Massey Ferguson Nigeria (TGF Tractor & Equipment Limited)

Location: Lagos, Abuja, Kano
Website: tgftractors.com.ng

TGF Tractor & Equipment is one of Nigeria’s authorized distributors of Massey Ferguson tractors, a globally trusted brand.

They offer a wide range of MF models from 50HP to 110HP tailored for small to large-scale farms.

TGF also provides implements, genuine spare parts, and professional maintenance services. With warehouses and service points across major Nigerian cities, they are a reliable choice for those looking to invest in long-term agricultural machinery solutions.

What Sets Them Apart:

  • Nationwide distribution network

  • 24/7 after-sales technical support

  • Training for farmers and cooperatives

2. Agricultural Equipment and Machinery (AEM)

Location: Ibadan, Oyo State
Website: aemtractors.com

AEM is known for selling brand-new and reconditioned tractors, including John Deere, New Holland, and Kubota models. Their focus is on affordability and flexibility, often supporting farmers with installment payment options and leasing schemes.

Their tractors are imported, refurbished (where applicable), and certified for Nigerian conditions.

Services Offered:

  • Tractor leasing services

  • Equipment training programs

  • Large stock of compatible implements

3. STIHL Nigeria / Mikano International Ltd.

Location: Lagos
Website: mikano-intl.com

While Mikano is well known for power generation, its partnership with STIHL and Case IH tractors has enabled it to make strong inroads into the agricultural machinery sector. They are official distributors of Case IH tractors, known for high-powered machines that support commercial farming.

Key Advantages:

  • Modern showroom with real-time demonstrations

  • Strong backing in financing via Mikano partnerships

  • Serves both corporate farms and government procurement schemes

4. Techo-Quip Nigeria Ltd.

Location: Lagos
Website: techo-quip.com

Established in 1993, Techo-Quip has grown into one of Nigeria’s most respected dealers for New Holland tractors and implements. The company is a key player in agricultural mechanization programs across Nigeria, often working with state governments and donor agencies.

Unique Offerings:

  • New Holland-authorized distributor

  • Implements such as harrows, plows, planters available

  • Comprehensive warranty on new machines

5. Kara Nigeria (Online Dealer)

Location: Online (Lagos-based warehouse)
Website: kara.com.ng

Kara is a fast-growing online platform for agricultural machinery and tractors. Their marketplace model gives buyers access to multiple brands, including Massey Ferguson, Sonalika, and Farmtrac.

With an easy-to-use interface and delivery across Nigeria, Kara is ideal for tech-savvy farmers and agri-startups.

Why Farmers Choose Kara:

  • Transparent pricing

  • E-commerce convenience

  • Doorstep delivery and installation options

6. Fadakar Nigeria Ltd.

Location: Ilorin, Kwara State
Website: N/A (offline dealer)

A regional powerhouse, Fadakar Nigeria supplies affordable tractors and equipment to North Central Nigeria.

The company focuses on community-based support, working with farmer cooperatives and local governments to deploy machinery where it’s needed most. They often carry Sonalika and refurbished John Deere models.

Community Impact:

  • Supports smallholder mechanization

  • Spare parts readily available

  • Rural service centers for technical support

7. Farmtrac Nigeria (A subsidiary of Escorts Group)

Location: Abuja
Website: farmtracnigeria.com

Farmtrac, from India’s Escorts Group, operates in Nigeria under authorized dealerships. Their tractors are affordable, robust, and built to last in tough African conditions. Farmtrac Nigeria has been particularly active in partnering with government agencies on mechanization subsidies.

Benefits:

  • Durable, high-torque tractors for clayey and sandy soils

  • Strong brand presence in Asia and Africa

  • Value-for-money spare parts

What to Consider When Choosing a Tractor Dealer in Nigeria

  • After-Sales Support: Ensure the dealer has local workshops or mobile technicians.

  • Spare Parts Availability: A dealer with stocked parts ensures fewer downtimes.

  • Brand Reliability: Go for dealers who are official brand representatives.

  • Financing Options: Some dealers offer installment payments or leasing.

  • Training and Orientation: Dealers who offer training sessions help reduce misuse and breakdowns.

The growth of tractor dealerships in Nigeria is a sign of a maturing agricultural sector that is slowly but surely embracing mechanization.

Whether you’re a smallholder farmer or a commercial agribusiness investor, these dealers offer access to world-class machinery, financing solutions, and the technical support necessary to succeed.

Investing in the right dealer is as important as investing in the right tractor.

As Nigeria pushes for food security and agricultural self-reliance, these top tractor dealers are playing a pivotal role in transforming the sector—one machine at a time.

Also Read

Fake Farm Inputs: Counterfeit Crisis Threatens Kenya’s Agriculture


Counterfeiting has deeply infiltrated Kenya’s agricultural sector, endangering food security, farmer livelihoods, and the integrity of the entire value chain.

According to the 2025 Consumer-Level Survey Report by the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (ACA), agricultural inputs—especially pesticides and fertilizers—top the list of most counterfeited products in the country.

Pesticides and Herbicides: The Hardest Hit

The survey reveals that a staggering 89.16% of respondents identified pesticides, insecticides, and herbicides as the most commonly counterfeited agricultural inputs.

This prevalence poses a serious threat not only to crop health but also to human and environmental safety.

Many counterfeit agrochemicals contain banned substances, diluted active ingredients, or toxic fillers that can destroy crops and render soils unproductive.

Fertilizers and Animal Feeds Under Siege

Following agrochemicals, 54.29% of respondents cited fertilizers as frequently counterfeited.

Fake fertilizers often lack essential nutrients or contain harmful components that stunt plant growth and diminish yields. Similarly, 45.60% of consumers pointed to animal feeds as another high-risk category, with fake products leading to poor livestock health and reduced productivity.

Other Targeted Inputs: Seeds and Tools

Seeds are another critical input under threat. Over one-third (34.09%) of respondents encountered counterfeit seeds, often sold in packaging that mimics certified brands.

These seeds may have low germination rates or be entirely non-viable, resulting in crop failure and income loss. Additionally, 13.66% mentioned agricultural equipment as being commonly faked, including hand tools and machinery components.

Root Causes: Price, Accessibility, and Weak Enforcement

Kenya’s counterfeit crisis in agriculture is driven by a combination of factors:

  • Affordability: With genuine inputs often priced beyond the reach of smallholder farmers, counterfeit alternatives become the default.

  • Weak regulation and enforcement: Inconsistent checks at border points and local markets allow fake products to flourish.

  • Low awareness: Many farmers unknowingly purchase fake inputs, unable to distinguish them from genuine ones due to sophisticated packaging imitations.

Devastating Impacts on Farmers and Food Security

The consequences of using counterfeit agricultural products are dire. Beyond immediate financial losses, farmers experience crop failure, livestock mortality, and long-term soil degradation.

On a national scale, this undermines food security, reduces export competitiveness, and erodes trust in supply chains.

Solutions Recommended in the ACA Report

The ACA report calls for a multi-pronged approach to combat counterfeiting in agriculture:

  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Strengthen outreach in rural areas to help farmers identify and report counterfeit inputs.

  • Stricter Regulations and Penalties: Enforce severe consequences for those caught producing or distributing fake agro-inputs.

  • Verification Technology: Promote mobile-based authentication systems that allow farmers to verify product authenticity before purchase.

  • Stronger Stakeholder Collaboration: Encourage joint efforts between government, input manufacturers, agro-dealers, and farmer groups to monitor supply chains.

Kenya’s battle against counterfeit agricultural inputs is not just a regulatory challenge—it is a war for the future of its food systems.

Farmers, consumers, and policymakers must unite to expose and eliminate fakes from the market.

With targeted interventions, improved enforcement, and farmer empowerment, Kenya can safeguard its agricultural sector from the silent sabotage of counterfeit goods.

Also Read

Kenya Withdraws 77 Pesticides from Market in Major Agricultural Reform

Smart Tractors in Africa: Are Smallholder Farms Ready?